- Home
- Your Visit
- What's On
- Exhibitions
- Permanent Galleries
- Special Displays
- Online Exhibitions
- Aden Emergency
- Black Asian British Army
- Britain's Greatest General
- Conflicts of Interest
- Cyprus, 1954-2008
- D-Day and the Battle for Normandy
- Defeat in the West
- Draw Your Weapons
- Enemy Commanders: Britain's Greatest Foes
- Akbar Khan
- Andrew Jackson
- Eduard Totleben
- Erwin Rommel - Transcript
- Erwin Rommel
- George Washington - Transcript
- George Washington
- James Fitzjames, Duke of Berwick
- Louis Botha
- Maurice de Saxe
- Michael Collins - Transcript
- Michael Collins
- Mustafa Kemal Atatürk - Transcript
- Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
- Napoleon Bonaparte - Transcript
- Napoleon Bonaparte
- Ntshingwayo kaMahole
- Osman Digna
- Paul von Hindenburg
- Paul von Lettow-Vorbeck
- Rani of Jhansi
- Riwha Titokowaru
- Santiago de Liniers
- Speakers' Soundbites
- The Event
- The Leaderboard
- The Online Vote
- Tipu Sultan
- Tomoyuki Yamashita
- Falklands War, 1982
- First Shots
- Florence Nightingale
- Helmand
- Indian Armies, Indian Art
- Kenya, 1952-60
- Korea 1950–53
- National Service
- North Africa, 1940-43
- Northern Ireland, 1969-2007
- Operation Market Garden
- Palestine
- TELIC
- The Gurkhas
- The Making of Britain
- The Malayan Emergency
- The Opium War
- The Road to Kabul
- The War for America
- The Western Front, 1918
- Victory in Europe
- WAACs at War
- War Horse: Fact & Fiction
- War in the Balkans, 1941-45
- Wives and Sweethearts
- Zulu War, 1879
- Kids
- Education
- Collection
- Research
- Get Involved
- Museum Shop



2 March 2012, 4.12am
Completely understood the
Completely understood the concept of total war, politically and militarily, along with the creation of the citizen army, in the modern era. And, unlike the despotic Napoleon, trully breathed and lived by the tenets of democracy, the rule of law, and the rights of man. Gen. Washington was so intent in sending the redcoats back to their island kingdom that he fully embraced the last few words of the U.S. Declaration of Independence in support of the permanent indepenence: "...with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor." From the beggining there was no turning back; crushing the British forces was the only option.
p.s. I can't believe Nathaniel Greene did not make the list.
9 March 2012, 5.38pm
General George Washington's
General George Washington's campaigns resulting in the British surrender at Yorktown and the eventual loss of the American colonies was the greatest defeat of British arms. A large portion of the vast British Empire was lost forever.
10 March 2012, 12.35am
Nothing succeeds like success
Nothing succeeds like success - and Washington was successful!
10 March 2012, 5.14am
If one measures the greatest
If one measures the greatest foe by the ultimate loss to the UK, then clearly Washington is the victor. While he never won a serious battle against the British, his ability to keep the war going resulted in the loss of Britain's most important colonies, a loss never rivaled again through force of arms (the loss of India was perhaps a larger loss, but it was mostly done without bloodshed and outside the context of a war).
10 March 2012, 8.31pm
I believe that the number of
I believe that the number of British troops surrendered at Yorktown was not exceeded until the surrender of the Singapore garrison to the Japanese in 1942.
12 March 2012, 11.36pm
The remarks by Javier,
The remarks by Javier, Robert, Colin and Clarke sum up the essence of Washington's skill as a military commander. It was his skill as a general that made Washington the foremopst of America's founding fathers. Drafting the Declaration of Independence and Constitution would have only been symbolic gestures without the military might to back them up. Unlike the 'army' of Michael Collins (the current leader of the poll!) Washington's men met and defeated the British Army on the field of battle on a number of occasions - something which made transformed an independent United States from a dream to a reality. For all of these reasons Washington deserves to be in the final five. So, vote, vote, vote ....and then get your friends to vote, vote, vote!!!
16 March 2012, 11.38am
Unlike many of the other
Unlike many of the other candidates (including Napoleon, surely one of the greatest generals in history) who were defeated in the end, Washington actually won. The others were a nuisance until they were defeated. Also, Washington cost Britain an empire: none of the others come close.
20 March 2012, 2.17am
The only true winner
The only true winner !!!!!!!!!
21 March 2012, 7.08pm
I agree 'Fabs' but how do you
I agree 'Fabs' but how do you translate yout comment into votes?
23 March 2012, 6.07pm
To Gerry White ;
To Gerry White ; democratically one vote at a time ?
27 March 2012, 4.23pm
Frank, ... I'm sorry of you
Frank, ... I'm sorry of you understood my post to be an exhortation to vote repeatedly! It is not, and in hindsight perhaps I should have used the 'vote' only once! What has occured in relation to what appears to have been a cyber attack in favour of Ataturk, is a disgrace. Additionally, the together with the large number of comments that display nationalistic sentiment as opposed to military analysis do not to just to the strategic or tactical flair of the individual leaders.I do however, feel that George Washington is most worthy of a place in the final five and should be represented by a suitable advocate on 14 April. Therefore, I may I urge those who sharme my views to vote for him ((democratically!)
6 April 2012, 5.24pm
I am very impressed with the
I am very impressed with the historical and well thought out discussion see in these posts. And not only because I am an American and cheering for our main founding father. (I didn't get to vote as I discovered this poll after the fact) It was a very interesting read. :) That fact that most of the posts in regards to Ataturk are nearly all in incomprehensible broken English or display outright Turkish nationalism leaves me to believe there was much outside "influence" in these polls. :/
20 April 2012, 5.06pm
Washington had one extra
Washington had one extra virtue that I don't see mentioned here. He knew when to give way, and could tell when someone else's plan was better than his own. Some of the greatest generals in history, such as Rommel and Bedford Forrest, suffered from an inability to collaborate; not Washington. That is in effect what led to victory. When the sudden appearance of De Grasse's French fleet off the American coast gave the allies an unexpected and probably unrepeatable strategic advantage, Washington proposed to use the limited and precious resource of Rochambeau's 5000 French soldiers to take New York City. Rochambeau argued that it made more sense to attack and destroy's Cornwallis' force at Yorktown, thus terminating the British ability to operate on the American mainland. Washington saw the sense in it, followed Rochambeau's plan - and the world was turned upside down, as the defeated British regulars were to sing.
14 May 2012, 6.11pm
I'm a descendant of Czech &
I'm a descendant of Czech & Slovak emigrants in the 1890s, & I agree that George W the 1st is the absolute correct choice, based on his ability to recognize & execute the 'strategic retreat' when appropriate (a lesson that, some 80-odd years later, Gen. Rob't E. Lee & his subordinates, Gens. James Longstreet & George Pickett apparently missed while at the Academy), and his character and general lack of concern for his own reputation. Let us not forget, tho' that in some ways, the British commitment to honor (as well as using outdated tactics) helped Dubya I.
I'm curious, tho' : why is William Wallace not on the list of nominees? (Oh, and please forgive any ignorance of British [or perhaps English], history that my question might reveal).
Add your comment
Please note: By submitting a comment you are agreeing to the terms laid out in the National Army Museum's Rules for User Comments. Any views expressed in user comments do not necessarily reflect or represent the views of the National Army Museum or its staff.