The Context
During the 18th century Britain and France were imperial rivals in North America. In 1754 their territorial disputes erupted into violence along the frontiers of their respective colonies. Both sides allied themselves with Native Americans, giving rise to the American name for the conflict, ‘The French and Indian War’. This regional dispute was subsumed into the global conflict of the Seven Years War in 1756.
The French initially held the upper hand, winning major victories at Oswego (1756) and Fort William Henry (1757), but from then on a new British government made a concerted effort to reinforce their position in North America, whereas the French focused more on their European commitments.
In 1758 the British re-captured Oswego and took Louisburg. This opened the sea route to attack Quebec, the main French settlement in North America. At the same time some of France’s Native American allies made peace with the British. The Royal Navy’s blockade of the coast of France was also restricting supplies to the French colonies. These circumstances now presented the British with the opportunity to assault Quebec.
The Armies
By 1759 James Wolfe (1727-59) was a rising star of the British Army, who had fought at Dettingen (1743), Culloden (1746) and Louisburg (1758) with great distinction. Although still only 32, Wolfe was appointed to command the 5,000-strong expedition against the fortress of Quebec. Most of his men were regular soldiers, although he also had a small force of colonial militia.
About 13,000 soldiers under Louis-Joseph de Montcalm (1712-59), Marquis de Saint-Veran, defended Quebec and its surroundings. This garrison consisted of French regulars, colonial militia and Native Americans. Only around 4,500 of these troops actually took part in the battle.
The Battle
In June 1759 a British amphibious force headed down the St Lawrence River and established a base on the Ile d’Orleans, opposite Quebec. The latter occupied an almost impregnable position and was defended by a series of redoubts and batteries along the river. Wolfe attempted to land at Beauport on 31 July, but his men were repelled with heavy losses.
In the following weeks Wolfe attacked and destroyed the French settlements along the St Lawrence in an unsuccessful attempt to draw Montcalm out of Quebec. By this time disease was beginning to spread through his army and at one point Wolfe himself was sick. He realised that he would have to act quickly before his force was too weak to take Quebec.
Reconnaissance of the river then revealed a cove to the west of the city that could be accessed by flat-bottomed landing craft. In the early hours of 13 September 1759 Wolfe landed there with his men. At the same time, the British fleet in the river launched a diversionary attack to distract the Quebec garrison. Climbing a steep path up the cliffs, Wolfe’s troops captured the small detachment guarding this stretch of bank. They then reached the ‘Heights of Abraham’, an undefended plateau behind Quebec. The French came out to meet them.
Montcalm deployed his troops in a traditional set-piece fashion. This relied on well-drilled and disciplined soldiers who could move in precise order. Unfortunately most of his men were not used to acting in concert and tended to fight and fire as individuals. This reduced the effect of concentrated fire at close range. Wolfe’s regulars were used to fighting in rank and firing quick disciplined volleys. They had been skillfully positioned behind a ridge to protect them from the French batteries in Quebec.
Wolfe had also ordered his men to double-load their muskets for the initial volley. In the brief battle that followed, their fire drove the French back into the city. They then repulsed a column of French reinforcements that approached the British rear. Montcalm and Wolfe were both mortally wounded and around 640 French and 650 British were killed or wounded. The French retreated into the town, which finally surrendered on 18 September.
The Impact
The French continued to fight on and prevailed in several battles after Quebec, including the victory at Sainte-Foy (1760). But the British did not relinquish their hold on the fortress. British naval dominance ensured that the French lacked the troops and supplies to reinforce their declining position. A run of British victories followed and in 1763 the Treaty of Paris ceded most of France's possessions in eastern North America to Britain.
Ironically, the British victory in North America sowed the seeds of a later revolt, for it freed the colonists from the need for British protection against the French threat on their frontier. The colonists’ objection to paying for a British garrison was one of the causes of the American War of Independence (1775-83).
Quebec did not join the American revolt. The Quebec Act of 1774 had given its inhabitants formal cultural autonomy within the British Empire so they did not support an American military expedition into Canada in 1775. The Roman Catholic French Canadians also had little in common with the Protestant American rebels.
The Legacy
When news of Wolfe’s death reached Britain on 16 October 1759, it seized the public imagination. He was seen as a young, heroic martyr and a paragon of martial virtue. As the greatest military hero of the mid-18th century, Wolfe was universally celebrated in paintings, prints, sculpture and other forms of popular culture. In the years that followed he was portrayed as one of Britain’s greatest imperial heroes.
In 1908, the 300th anniversary of the founding of Quebec City, the great and the good of the British Empire gathered at the Heights of Abraham to mark the opening of the Battlefields Park. A monument to Wolfe, raised on the battle site, bore an inscription which read: ‘Here Died Wolfe Victorious.’ More recently an interpretive centre and walking trails have been added.
Although the British took control of Quebec, it retained its French character and does so to this day, testament to the impact of French colonisation. This identity means that the legacy of the battle remains ambiguous. Quebec’s French-speaking separatists have turned it into a symbol of their subjugation, defining it as the moment at which English speakers came to dominate the cultural, political and commercial life of Canada. However, since 1969 both French and English have had equal status as the official languages of Canada.
In 2009 a re-enactment of the battle, planned to mark its 250th anniversary, was cancelled following protests. Instead a small monument dedicated to all who fought at Quebec was unveiled. Likewise, the inscription on Wolfe’s monument has been altered to avoid offending French Canadians. It now reads: ‘Here Died Wolfe’.
Despite the differing interpretations, the Battle of Quebec remains the deciding moment in the conflict between Britain and France over the destiny of what later became Canada.
20 April 2013, 2.47pm
I believe the battle of
I believe the battle of Quebec 1759 should get more recognition as one of Britain's greatest battles if not the worlds simply for its untold future significance. We kicked the French, there culture and future migrants out of North America. Imagine today a 350 million french speaking superpower stretching from the Mexican border to the North pole.No American independence and consequent bankrupt France and revolution followed by the Napoleonic wars. Swap unhappy Quebec province today for 13 small grumpy old English speaking colonies sitting awkward in a French cultural universe.
Today France isolated and Britain smug in a British dominated Europe. Maybe we should have lost!!!
5 March 2013, 12.03am
North America was no longer a
North America was no longer a French territory!
14 February 2013, 8.40pm
Quebec was a genuine
Quebec was a genuine strategic victory, it opened up North America to the British and had a lob resonance rarely achieved by a unique land battle.
Add your comment
Please note: By submitting a comment you are agreeing to the terms laid out in the National Army Museum's Rules for User Comments. Any views expressed in user comments do not necessarily reflect or represent the views of the National Army Museum or its staff.