National Army Museum logo
Visit the National Army Museum Print Shop
view counter

  • Date: 22-23 January 1879
  • Location: Natal (in modern-day South Africa)
  • Campaign: Zulu War (1879)
  • Combatants: Britain and the Colony of Natal against the Zulu Kingdom
  • Protagonists: Lieutenant John Chard VC and Lieutenant Gonville Bromhead VC; Dabulamanzi kaMpande
  • Outcome: British victory against great odds

14 comments

Allan Hatch
12 April 2013, 8.16pm

number 1

number 1

John Hop
9 March 2013, 10.16am

Isandlawana was one of

Isandlawana was one of Britains greatest defeats against native forces but I do feel that the dogged stand at Rorke's Drift should be considered as the greatest battle of the British Army as they were so heavily outnumbered. If they had not defended that position it would have all been over in 10 minutes as the main column learnt to its cost. If they had formed square or laager at Isandlawana it may have been a different outcome. The Zulu impis were a very brave and skilled native enemy force.

bomber
7 March 2013, 4.34pm

I've been to Rorke's Drift

I've been to Rorke's Drift and it's about 1/3rd of the size depicted in the film. The fighting must have been brutal, to have so many warriors in such a small perimeter. They have finally placed a plaque at the site to commemorate the bravery of the Zulus, which is good to see.

The main error in the film is Hook. In real life he was teetotal and a model soldier. In the film he is the exact opposite. I believe his descendants walking out of the film's premier.

Why should it be number 1? The overwhelming odds against make it such. Most of the other battles are fairly even or a slight advantage to either side. Here we have 4,000 against 130 and the 130 win with very few casualties. Of those who did die, several were confined to bed in the hospital, rather than killed in fight.

MGething
25 February 2013, 4.02pm

As Lance Corporal Jones would

As Lance Corporal Jones would have said "they don't like it up 'em". God bless the British Tommy of all generations.

Mark Tebbit
24 February 2013, 4.56pm

I certainly loved the film.

I certainly loved the film. Not sure how much of it was true, though! Nevertheless a fantastic tribute to the skills and courage of the British army.

Geoff Rees
21 February 2013, 11.09pm

The film 'Zulu', although it

The film 'Zulu', although it distorts many of the historical facts, is the favourite war movie of the British army, showing as it does the supreme courage of soldiers under extreme circumstances. This preference in itself must argue eloquently for the case of RD being regarded as Britain's greatest battle as it is a judgment made by men who really know what it is like to be in the front line.

In reality, the particpants faced much harsher conditions than the film displays and a ferocious enemy who vastly outnumbered them.

Five companies of the 1st battalion and others had been massacred at Isandlwana at mid-day on the same day. The news of this catastrophe arrived almost simultaneously with sightings of more Zulus crossing the river to attack the store depot and hospital at Rorke's Drift. There were no great generals to direct the building of fortifications or to direct tactics. What I find most inspiring about the battle is that it was won by 'ordinary' men who outwitted and outfaced the Zulus and who fought so heroically for one another.

Just before the start of the battle the Imperial troops were faced with the desertion of a large force of native soldiers ... how exposed must they have felt at that moment ... how their blood must have run cold ... yet they defended the outpost to a man over a nightmarish twelve hour period.

A record number of VCs were awarded for bravery during the battle, but there were countless acts of self-sacrifice and many others could have been decorated. My great-grandfather risked his life to pull John Chard out of the line of fire. Mercifully, he survived, an act of God or accident of fate for which I and hundreds of his descendants will be forever grateful.

Queen Victoria asked the celebrated war artist, Lady Elizabeth Butler to paint the battle. When Lady Butler suggested a different subject, the Queen sent a messenger to her insisting that she depict the heroes of RD. This should indicate how highly the Queen regarded these courageous soldiers. Lady Butler visited the survivors who had returned to Portsmouth in the Autumn of 1879 and she was treated to a re-enactment of the battle. Some of the survivors were singled out to be models, including my great-grandfather, David Jenkins, who is depicted in the sketch of the kneeling soldier which precedes these web comments.

Geoff Rees
21 February 2013, 8.30pm

My great-grandfather, David

My great-grandfather, David Jenkins, along with other survivors of the battle, was a model for Lady Butler's famous painting of Rorke's Drift. She sent him a personal letter of thanks and when Lord Butler accompanied King Edward V11 on his visit to Swansea in 1904, he sought out David to further pass on his wife's thanks. The sketch above is almost certainly that of my ancestor and not of James 'Edmund' Jenkins, as wrongly stated in some art history books. The sketch is a very close likeness to David. To read more about him and see a picture of him, read The Tanners' Arms, Defynnog (near Brecon) website. David's father was the landlord of this lovely pub in 1879.

The survivors of the battle were all given a scroll by the Mayor of Durban and a Bible by the 'Ladies of Durban'. David's Rorke's Drift Bible, donated to Brecon Reg Museum a few years ago, is on display in the military museum at Cardiff Castle.

dupers51
21 February 2013, 12.10am

Odds of over 25 to 1 and

Odds of over 25 to 1 and nobody panicked

Archie W
16 February 2013, 3.47pm

What this excellent but brief

What this excellent but brief article doesn't highlight is how in this garrison, 35 men were ill and in the hospital and 16 were so ill as to be immobile. Remember that disease was rife in the British army in South Africa, and cholera, dissentry and fever (to name but a few) took more British lives in that country than the Zulus or the Boers. They were the underdogs, for example Bromhead was partially deaf, and this was probably partly to blame for why he was left behind with the ill and the NNC, the so-called 'untrained untrainables'. You may hear stories of the barrels of the men's Martini-Henry rifles glowing red from the heat, or the excessive heat causing the guns to fire before the trigger had been pulled at the height of the battle.

This battle should be number 1, not because it changed the outcome of the Zulu war, which with Chelmsford's three powerful columns was something of a foregone conclusion, but because even though they knew that the Zulus had just massacred 850 soldiers from a modern British army regiment, and yet obeyed the old Maxim that British soldiers stand and fight. If you are interested, in the Zulu war, then have a look at a man called David Rattray, who wrote an excellent book on the subject.

Baker
15 February 2013, 5.45pm

It spawned a legend and a

It spawned a legend and a great film too, but was it the greatest? Well I'm certainly not denying that it took bravery to stand against such formidable enemy, outnumbered as they were. However I have recently read a rather good account of the Zulu war by Saul David and came across some suprisingly acerbic comments from contemporaries.

General Sir Garnet Wolseley wrote in his journal: "It is monstrous making heroes of those... who, shut up in buildings at Rorke's Drift, could not bolt and fought like rats for their lives, which they could not otherwise save."

I found this pretty strong criticism of the defenders, but it seems worth bearing in mind that the opinion of those alive at the time may be better informed than our own. On the other hand the author suggests that there is an element of jealousy as Wolseley, despite being tremendously brave earlier in his career, was never awarded a VC as the award had not yet been created.

It was a source of fame for some but what of its legacy? It certainly did not decide the outcome of the war... I feel it should be on the list but not at number one. It does not have the significance of Kohima, D-Day, Quebec or Waterloo but perhaps because of that it seems simpler, more intimate and easier to relate to. No grand battlefield map clustered with arrows and division or brigade numbers etc... Just a handful of men in a flyblown outpost, setting their teeth and deciding to make a stand. Since that is indicative of all the small battles and skirmishes fought around the world by the army, for so long the firefighter of the Empire, it should certainly have a place here perhaps more for what it represents and the images it conjures up in the mind rather than for its own sake.

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

(By ticking this box you agree for your name and email address to be added to the National Army Museum's mailing list. You also accept the terms of the National Army Museum's Privacy Policy)

Please note: By submitting a comment you are agreeing to the terms laid out in the National Army Museum's Rules for User Comments. Any views expressed in user comments do not necessarily reflect or represent the views of the National Army Museum or its staff.