The Context
In 1877 Lord Carnarvon, Secretary of State for the Colonies, sent Sir Bartle Frere to southern Africa as British High Commissioner. Both men were intent on creating a federal dominion of the British colonies and Boer Republics. To implement Carnarvon's policy, Frere had to gain control over Zululand, a warrior kingdom bordering Natal and the Transvaal. After King Cetshwayo refused to disband his Zulu army or to cooperate with the plan for federation, a force commanded by Lieutenant-General Lord Chelmsford invaded Zululand in January 1879.
Chelmsford's invasion force was split into three columns. The right column, under Colonel Charles Pearson, crossed into Zululand near the mouth of the Tugela River. The left column, under Colonel Evelyn Wood, entered Zululand from the Transvaal. The centre column, which Chelmsford himself accompanied, crossed the Buffalo River at Rorke's Drift mission station to seek out Cetshwayo's army. The Zulu king split his forces to match the invading columns.
Underestimating the Zulus' speed of movement and fighting ability, Chelmsford divided his column. On 22 January 1879 the Zulus surprised his camp at Isandlwana, under the command of Colonel Henry Pulleine. The camp had not been adequately prepared to resist attack and the troops were dangerously strung out. Pulleine’s over-extended line was swamped by the sheer weight of numbers and the majority of his 1,700 troops were killed. After their victory at Isandlwana around 4,000 Zulus pressed on to Rorke's Drift across the Buffalo River, where the British had established a depot and hospital.
The Armies
Dabulamanzi kaMpande (1839-86) led the Zulus at Rorke’s Drift. Cetshwayo's half-brother, he had commanded the Undi Corps at Isandlwana. His men were formidable opponents. They were courageous under fire, manoeuvred with great skill and were adept in hand-to-hand combat. Although the Zulus had some old-fashioned muskets and a few modern rifles, most of their warriors were armed with shields and ‘assegais’. The latter came in two forms, a thinner-bladed throwing spear and a broad-bladed stabbing spear.
The British garrison at Rorke’s Drift was around 150-strong. It consisted of ‘B’ Company, 2nd Battalion, 24th (2nd Warwickshire) Regiment, under Lieutenant Gonville Bromhead (1845-91), a small contingent of Natal colonial troops, and part of No. 5 Field Company, Royal Engineers, commanded by Lieutenant John Chard (1847-97).
The Battle
When survivors from Isandlwana reached Rorke’s Drift with news of the approaching Zulus, Chard, Bromhead and Assistant Commissary James Dalton of the Commissariat and Transport Department met to decide whether to retreat or defend the station. Dalton argued that their small force, travelling in open country and burdened with hospital patients, would easily be caught by the fast-moving Zulus. It was agreed that they would stay and fight.
They set about building improvised barricades from ‘mealie’ (maize) bags, biscuit boxes and crates of tinned meat. The buildings were also loop-holed for defence, but shortly after the first shots were fired at around 4.30pm, most of the Natal Native Infantry and Natal Native Horse left, reducing the garrison to around 150 troops.
When the Zulus attacked they were unable to reach the men behind the barricades with their assegais. Many warriors were shot down at point blank range and the bayonets of the defenders repulsed any that did manage to climb the barricades. Those Zulus who did have firearms were poor shots, unlike the well-drilled British redcoats behind the defences. The soldiers who were too badly wounded to shoot reloaded guns and distributed ammunition to those who could still fire.
As battle raged, the Zulus set fire to the hospital, burst in and began to assegai the patients. They were fought off with bayonets and the surviving patients were rescued after soldiers hacked holes in the walls separating the rooms and dragged them through and into the barricaded yard. As night fell the British withdrew to the centre of the station where a final redoubt had been hastily built. Fighting continued, but after 12 hours of combat the Zulus were eventually beaten off leaving over 400 dead on the battlefield. The garrison suffered 17 dead. Almost every man had sustained some kind of wound.
The Impact
The Victorian public was shocked by the news that 'spear-wielding savages' had massacred their army at Isandlwana. The heroic stand at Rorke’s Drift was thus a welcome boost to British morale, but it had little effect on the campaign as a whole.
Pearson's column had meanwhile defeated the Zulus at Nyezane on 22 January 1879 and occupied Eshowe. Hearing of the defeat at Isandlwana, he fortified the post and remained there, blockaded by the Zulus. Chelmsford, having marched to Pearson's relief, then defeated the Zulus at Gigindhlovu on 2 April and evacuated the Eshowe garrison. By the end of the month most of Chelmsford's men were back in Natal. In the north, Wood's column had withdrawn to a camp at Khambula and on 29 March he defeated a major Zulu attack.
At the end of May, Chelmsford invaded Zululand again. On 4 July he drew up his reinforced army in a large square opposite Cetshwayo's capital at Ulundi. Around 20,000 Zulus attacked in their usual fashion but, faced with Gatling guns and artillery, their brave charges soon petered out. Cetshwayo’s army was utterly defeated and he was later hunted down and captured.
The Zulu monarchy was suppressed and Zululand divided into autonomous areas. Civil war followed and in 1883, in an unsuccessful attempt to restore order, the British returned Cetshwayo to his throne. His powers had been greatly reduced, and he died the following year. In 1887 Zululand was declared British territory and finally annexed to Natal ten years later.
In the hope of diverting public attention away from the disaster at Isandlwana Disraeli’s government seized upon the successful defence of the station, issuing 11 Victoria Crosses (VC) and five Distinguished Conduct Medals to the survivors. It did not work and his administration, already foundering on the issue of foreign policy, lost the 1880 election, brought down in part by the Zulu War.
The Legacy
Unsurprisingly, it was the defence of Rorke’s Drift and the subsequent award of 11 VCs, rather than the defeat at Isandlwana, that passed into British folklore. The artists Elizabeth (later Lady) Butler and Alphonse-Marie-Adolphe de Neuville both contributed to this by quickly producing highly popular dramatisations of the battle. Butler’s ‘Defence of Rorke’s Drift (1880) was shown at the Royal Academy exhibition in 1881, attracting a ‘great crush’ of onlookers.
Public fascination with the battle has continued through books, films and video games, but it was the film ‘Zulu’ (1964) that gave the battle worldwide fame. Directed by Cy Endfield and produced by Stanley Baker (who also played John Chard), the film also starred Michael Caine (Gonville Bromhead), Jack Hawkins (missionary Otto Witt) and future South African politician Mangosuthu Buthelezi who played his great-grandfather King Cetshwayo.
12 April 2013, 8.16pm
number 1
number 1
9 March 2013, 10.16am
Isandlawana was one of
Isandlawana was one of Britains greatest defeats against native forces but I do feel that the dogged stand at Rorke's Drift should be considered as the greatest battle of the British Army as they were so heavily outnumbered. If they had not defended that position it would have all been over in 10 minutes as the main column learnt to its cost. If they had formed square or laager at Isandlawana it may have been a different outcome. The Zulu impis were a very brave and skilled native enemy force.
7 March 2013, 4.34pm
I've been to Rorke's Drift
I've been to Rorke's Drift and it's about 1/3rd of the size depicted in the film. The fighting must have been brutal, to have so many warriors in such a small perimeter. They have finally placed a plaque at the site to commemorate the bravery of the Zulus, which is good to see.
The main error in the film is Hook. In real life he was teetotal and a model soldier. In the film he is the exact opposite. I believe his descendants walking out of the film's premier.
Why should it be number 1? The overwhelming odds against make it such. Most of the other battles are fairly even or a slight advantage to either side. Here we have 4,000 against 130 and the 130 win with very few casualties. Of those who did die, several were confined to bed in the hospital, rather than killed in fight.
25 February 2013, 4.02pm
As Lance Corporal Jones would
As Lance Corporal Jones would have said "they don't like it up 'em". God bless the British Tommy of all generations.
24 February 2013, 4.56pm
I certainly loved the film.
I certainly loved the film. Not sure how much of it was true, though! Nevertheless a fantastic tribute to the skills and courage of the British army.
21 February 2013, 11.09pm
The film 'Zulu', although it
The film 'Zulu', although it distorts many of the historical facts, is the favourite war movie of the British army, showing as it does the supreme courage of soldiers under extreme circumstances. This preference in itself must argue eloquently for the case of RD being regarded as Britain's greatest battle as it is a judgment made by men who really know what it is like to be in the front line.
In reality, the particpants faced much harsher conditions than the film displays and a ferocious enemy who vastly outnumbered them.
Five companies of the 1st battalion and others had been massacred at Isandlwana at mid-day on the same day. The news of this catastrophe arrived almost simultaneously with sightings of more Zulus crossing the river to attack the store depot and hospital at Rorke's Drift. There were no great generals to direct the building of fortifications or to direct tactics. What I find most inspiring about the battle is that it was won by 'ordinary' men who outwitted and outfaced the Zulus and who fought so heroically for one another.
Just before the start of the battle the Imperial troops were faced with the desertion of a large force of native soldiers ... how exposed must they have felt at that moment ... how their blood must have run cold ... yet they defended the outpost to a man over a nightmarish twelve hour period.
A record number of VCs were awarded for bravery during the battle, but there were countless acts of self-sacrifice and many others could have been decorated. My great-grandfather risked his life to pull John Chard out of the line of fire. Mercifully, he survived, an act of God or accident of fate for which I and hundreds of his descendants will be forever grateful.
Queen Victoria asked the celebrated war artist, Lady Elizabeth Butler to paint the battle. When Lady Butler suggested a different subject, the Queen sent a messenger to her insisting that she depict the heroes of RD. This should indicate how highly the Queen regarded these courageous soldiers. Lady Butler visited the survivors who had returned to Portsmouth in the Autumn of 1879 and she was treated to a re-enactment of the battle. Some of the survivors were singled out to be models, including my great-grandfather, David Jenkins, who is depicted in the sketch of the kneeling soldier which precedes these web comments.
21 February 2013, 8.30pm
My great-grandfather, David
My great-grandfather, David Jenkins, along with other survivors of the battle, was a model for Lady Butler's famous painting of Rorke's Drift. She sent him a personal letter of thanks and when Lord Butler accompanied King Edward V11 on his visit to Swansea in 1904, he sought out David to further pass on his wife's thanks. The sketch above is almost certainly that of my ancestor and not of James 'Edmund' Jenkins, as wrongly stated in some art history books. The sketch is a very close likeness to David. To read more about him and see a picture of him, read The Tanners' Arms, Defynnog (near Brecon) website. David's father was the landlord of this lovely pub in 1879.
The survivors of the battle were all given a scroll by the Mayor of Durban and a Bible by the 'Ladies of Durban'. David's Rorke's Drift Bible, donated to Brecon Reg Museum a few years ago, is on display in the military museum at Cardiff Castle.
21 February 2013, 12.10am
Odds of over 25 to 1 and
Odds of over 25 to 1 and nobody panicked
16 February 2013, 3.47pm
What this excellent but brief
What this excellent but brief article doesn't highlight is how in this garrison, 35 men were ill and in the hospital and 16 were so ill as to be immobile. Remember that disease was rife in the British army in South Africa, and cholera, dissentry and fever (to name but a few) took more British lives in that country than the Zulus or the Boers. They were the underdogs, for example Bromhead was partially deaf, and this was probably partly to blame for why he was left behind with the ill and the NNC, the so-called 'untrained untrainables'. You may hear stories of the barrels of the men's Martini-Henry rifles glowing red from the heat, or the excessive heat causing the guns to fire before the trigger had been pulled at the height of the battle.
This battle should be number 1, not because it changed the outcome of the Zulu war, which with Chelmsford's three powerful columns was something of a foregone conclusion, but because even though they knew that the Zulus had just massacred 850 soldiers from a modern British army regiment, and yet obeyed the old Maxim that British soldiers stand and fight. If you are interested, in the Zulu war, then have a look at a man called David Rattray, who wrote an excellent book on the subject.
15 February 2013, 5.45pm
It spawned a legend and a
It spawned a legend and a great film too, but was it the greatest? Well I'm certainly not denying that it took bravery to stand against such formidable enemy, outnumbered as they were. However I have recently read a rather good account of the Zulu war by Saul David and came across some suprisingly acerbic comments from contemporaries.
General Sir Garnet Wolseley wrote in his journal: "It is monstrous making heroes of those... who, shut up in buildings at Rorke's Drift, could not bolt and fought like rats for their lives, which they could not otherwise save."
I found this pretty strong criticism of the defenders, but it seems worth bearing in mind that the opinion of those alive at the time may be better informed than our own. On the other hand the author suggests that there is an element of jealousy as Wolseley, despite being tremendously brave earlier in his career, was never awarded a VC as the award had not yet been created.
It was a source of fame for some but what of its legacy? It certainly did not decide the outcome of the war... I feel it should be on the list but not at number one. It does not have the significance of Kohima, D-Day, Quebec or Waterloo but perhaps because of that it seems simpler, more intimate and easier to relate to. No grand battlefield map clustered with arrows and division or brigade numbers etc... Just a handful of men in a flyblown outpost, setting their teeth and deciding to make a stand. Since that is indicative of all the small battles and skirmishes fought around the world by the army, for so long the firefighter of the Empire, it should certainly have a place here perhaps more for what it represents and the images it conjures up in the mind rather than for its own sake.
Add your comment
Please note: By submitting a comment you are agreeing to the terms laid out in the National Army Museum's Rules for User Comments. Any views expressed in user comments do not necessarily reflect or represent the views of the National Army Museum or its staff.