The Context
In March 1815 the French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte escaped from exile on the Mediterranean island of Elba and returned to power in France. With Europe’s armies mobilising against him, Napoleon decided to go on the offensive. He hoped to win a quick victory that might shake the coalition formed against him, and even knock one or more of his enemies out of the war.
He looked to the Netherlands where two armies were concentrating. These were a Prussian Army under Field Marshal Gebhard von Blücher and an allied force of British, Dutch, Belgian and Germans under Field Marshal the Duke of Wellington. Together, these two armies outnumbered the French. Napoleon’s best chance of success, therefore, was to keep them apart and defeat each separately.
On 15 June Napoleon crossed the River Sambre in an attempt to drive a wedge between Wellington and Blücher’s Prussians. The following day at Ligny the main part of his army defeated the Prussians who were forced to retreat with losses of over 20,000 men. French casualties were only half that number.
That same day Wellington beat off a French attack on the crossroads at Quatre Bras. However, the defeat of the Prussians at Ligny meant that he too had to retreat or risk being outflanked and overwhelmed. The Prussian defeat might have been more decisive had not poor staff work led an entire French corps to march back and forth between Ligny and Quatre Bras without attacking either force.
On 17 June, in pouring rain and pursued by Napoleon’s main force, Wellington fell back to the ridge of Mont St Jean, just south of the village of Waterloo.
Napoleon had detached Marshal Grouchy’s 33,000 men to follow the Prussians, but he lost contact with them. Unknown to the French, the Prussians, although defeated, were still in decent shape. They were retreating, not eastwards along their lines of communication, but northwards towards Wavre. This meant that, instead of moving away from Wellington, the Prussians were able to keep in contact with him. Emboldened by Blücher’s promise to send troops, Wellington resolved to stand and fight on 18 June until the Prussians could arrive.
The Armies
A veteran of campaigns in India and the Peninsular War (1808-14), the Duke of Wellington (1762-1852) was already a national hero. At Waterloo he commanded 68,000 men and 156 guns. About a third of his soldiers were British, some relatively raw, others Peninsular veterans. The rest were of mixed quality. His King’s German Legion soldiers were as good as any, but others were inexperienced or of doubtful loyalty. With such a force there was no question of Wellington going on the offensive.
About a mile (1.5km) from the allied line lay Napoleon’s army. France’s greatest military commander, Napoleon Bonaparte (1769-1821) had established himself as master of Europe before being deposed in 1813. He returned from exile determined to win one final victory. His army at Waterloo was composed of veterans who had rallied to his cause on his return to France. Having detached 33,000 men under Grouchy to shadow the Prussians, Napoleon had 72,000 men and 246 guns.
The 48,000-strong Prussian Army, led by Field Marshal Gebhard von Blücher (1742-1819), was a mix of veteran, militia and reserve units. Its strength lay in the officer corps, especially its General Staff, who managed to reorganise the army and move it to Waterloo within 48 hours of its defeat at Ligny. Nicknamed ‘Marshal Forwards’ because of his aggressive tactics, Blücher was a veteran of Jena (1806), Lützen (1813) and Leipzig (1813).
The Battle
Wellington drew up his army along the ridge of Mont St Jean. Using tactics he had perfected in Spain, he positioned the bulk of his forces on the reverse slope of the ridge where they could not be easily seen by the enemy and were sheltered from artillery fire.
Three outposts lay in front of the ridge. To the west stood the Chateau of Hougoumont, which Wellington garrisoned with British Guardsmen and German Light Infantry. In the centre was the farm of La Haye Sainte, defended by more Germans and British riflemen. At the east end of the ridge lay the hamlet of Papelotte, occupied by German Duchy of Nassau troops.
Napoleon’s plan was simple, a diversionary attack against Hougoumont, followed by a main attack against Wellington’s left centre. In order to allow the ground to dry out following the previous night’s downpour, Napoleon delayed his attack until 11.30am. Following a massive artillery bombardment, the effects of which were partly negated by Wellington’s dispositions and by the wet ground, Jerome Bonaparte’s Division of Marshal Reille’s corps attacked Hougoumont.
The French cleared the wood in front of the chateau but were shot down as they left its shelter. A small group did manage to break into the chateau via the north gate, which had been left open to facilitate resupply. But the defenders managed to shut the gates and kill them. The chateau remained in British hands all day.
The original purpose of the French attack had been to induce Wellington to send more troops into Hougoumont, thus weakening his position elsewhere. However, while the Duke was frugal with his reinforcements, the French committed more men into the attack until nearly all of Reille’s corps were engaged.
At about 1.30pm Marshal D’Erlon’s corps attacked the allied left centre. They achieved initial success, driving back Major-General Bylandt’s Dutch-Belgians, but as they crested the ridge, they were stopped by General Picton’s division and then counter-attacked by British heavy cavalry.
While Major-General Lord Somerset’s Household Brigade drove back the supporting French cavalry, Major-General Ponsonby’s Union Brigade smashed into D’Erlon’s infantry. They routed three of his four divisions but then carried their pursuit too far, charging the French guns across the valley. They were counter-attacked by French cavalry and cut to pieces.
Learning that Prussian forces were heading for the battlefield, Napoleon ordered General Lobau’s corps to face them on his right flank. At about 4pm, believing the Allies were pulling back, Marshal Ney launched a cavalry charge against the infantry of Wellington’s right centre. The latter formed square and although more and more cavalry were committed to the attack, the soggy ground hampered the French. They also lacked infantry support. They could make no impression on the squares, which held firm despite suffering casualties from artillery fire.
Meanwhile, the Prussians were arriving in force on Napoleon’s right, obliging him to detach more troops to steady the situation. At about 6pm Ney’s infantry captured La Haye Sainte, severely weakening Wellington’s position. Ney brought up artillery and skirmishers and, under a withering fire, Wellington’s centre began to disintegrate.
Ney called for reinforcements to push home his advantage, but Napoleon first sent troops to recapture the village of Plancenoit from the Prussians, giving Wellington time to strengthen his position. The timely arrival of Lieutenant-General von Ziethen’s Prussian corps on Wellington’s left was critical in enabling him to shift units to shore up his centre.
Finally, at about 7pm, in a last bid for victory, Napoleon released his Imperial Guard, his finest troops. Two large columns of Guardsmen marched up the ridge between Hougoumont and La Haye Sainte. Unfortunately for them, they chose to attack where Wellington was strongest.
Under heavy fire from Major-General Maitland’s Foot Guards, Major-General Adam’s Light Infantry and General Chassé’s Belgians, the Imperial Guard halted, wavered, and finally broke. Their defeat sent the rest of the French Army into panic. A general retreat ensued which continued all night, harried by the Prussian cavalry.
The Impact
Napoleon’s gamble had failed. He had lost nearly 40,000 men killed, wounded or captured to the Allies’ 22,000. Napoleon spoke of fighting on, but when the Allies entered Paris on 7 July, he was forced to abdicate. He spent the rest of his life in exile on the island of St Helena in the South Atlantic.
Wellington was lauded on his return to Britain and showered with further honours. He eventually entered politics and became prime minister (1828-30 and 1834).
Waterloo ended the wars that had convulsed Europe and much of the globe since the French Revolution (1789-99). It also ended France’s attempts, whether under Louis XIV or Napoleon, to dominate the continent. Waterloo inaugurated a general European peace that, apart from the brief interruption of the Crimean War (1854-56), lasted until 1914. In the years that followed 1815, France and Britain were brought closer together, fighting as partners in the Crimea and remaining allies through two World Wars.
The Legacy
Visits to the battlefield of Waterloo started immediately after the campaign and continue to this day. Among the attractions is the Lion’s Mound. King William I of the Netherlands built it in 1820 on the spot where he believed his son the Prince of Orange had been wounded. Visible for miles around, the monument dominates the area. A visitor centre has been built nearby that provides interpretation about the campaign.
There are other memorials at the Brussels-Charleroi and Braine L'Alleud-Ohain crossroads, locations of mass graves of British, Dutch and Hanoverian soldiers. A French monument, ‘The Wounded Eagle’, marks the spot where a unit of the Imperial Guard made its last stand. A monument to the Prussian dead is located in Placenoit village. There are also plaques and memorial stones at La Haye Sainte and Hougoumont.
The Wellington Museum in Waterloo village, the Duke’s headquarters during the battle, includes displays and artefacts and stands opposite the church of St Joseph, which houses many memorials to the fallen. The Caillou farmhouse, site of Napoleon’s headquarters, has also been transformed into a museum.
In Britain and throughout the Commonwealth, Waterloo and Wellington have been commemorated in the names of streets, railways stations, bridges, public houses and parks. The name ‘Waterloo’ itself has entered the English vocabulary; one who has been defeated after a run of success is said to have ‘met their Waterloo’. The pop group Abba’s winning entry in the 1974 Eurovision Song Contest was based on this phrase.
The battle has featured in many novels, such as Stendhal’s ‘The Charterhouse of Parma’ (1839), William Makepeace Thackeray’s ‘Vanity Fair’ (1847) and, more recently, Bernard Cornwell’s ‘Sharpe’s Waterloo’ (1990) and Susanna Clarke’s ‘Jonathan Strange and Mr Norrell’ (2004). Cinematic depictions include Karl Grune's ‘Waterloo’ (1929) and Sergei Bondarchuk’s ‘Waterloo’ (1970), which featured Christopher Plummer as Wellington and Rod Steiger as Napoleon. Interest in the battle continues to grow and groups such as Waterloo 200 are organising nationwide events to celebrate its bicentenary in 2015.
19 March 2013, 10.30pm
Drummy 1945: Those French
Drummy 1945: Those French "Grenadiers" were in fact 'Chasseurs' of the Garde Imperiale who also wore bearskin caps which by that date denoted 'elite' rather than simple grenadier status. Not that many people on the ridge that day would have known or gave a fig by that time.
Since, after driving back one body of Chasseurs, the 2nd Bn, 1st Foot Guards had to fall back when caught over extended by another column coming up, it might have been fair also to award bearskins to Colborne's 52nd Regiment who caught that column in flank and precipitated the retreat of the Imperial Guard in that quarter of the field. Wellington, however, seems to have been annoyed with Colborne for some reason.
The Chasseurs were, technically, light infantry. The "First, or Light Infantry, Regiment of Foot Guards"? H'm. The 52nd, of course, were Light Infantry already.
"When the legend become history, print the legend."
19 March 2013, 9.43pm
"Waterloo inaugurated a
"Waterloo inaugurated a general European peace that, apart from the brief interruption of the Crimean War (1854-56), lasted until 1914."
Er-
1830 Belgian 'War of Independence. Constitutionalist 'Revolutions': France, Switzerland.
November uprising,Poland
1833-1839 First Carlist War Spain
1848 'The Year of Revolutions: France, Germany,Poland, Italy, Hungary
1848-51 First Schleswig War
[1854-56 Crimean War]
1859 Italian War of 1859 (Franco-Austrian) : Magenta, Solferino
1864 2nd Schleswig War
1866 Austro-Prussian War: Konigratz/Sadowa
1870 Franco-Prussian War: Worth, Mars-le-Tour, Gravelotte-St. Privat. Sedan Siege of Paris
March on Rome
1872-1876 Third Carlist War- Spain
1878- Russo-Turkish War- Bulgaria
1885- Serbo-Bulgarian War
Also fog in channel on numerous occasions. Continent cut off.
19 March 2013, 11.16am
I believe this expression of
I believe this expression of the Waterloo engagement was straight to the point and explains where we are at present.
2 March 2013, 1.34pm
Baker does put some good
Baker does put some good points but seems to miss the most obvious. The reason the British stood and fought was because WELLINGTON was in command. The reason that the British line was not devastated by the opening French artillery barrage was because Wellington had previously reconnoited the area and had deliberately chosen the terrain in which he positioned his army. By having the ability to position his troops behind the ridge he enabled Ney to mistakenly believe the British were retreating. This precipitated his decision to destroy what he thought was the allied withdrawal..
I find your remarks "Had they not stubbornly remained even when outnumbered and outclassed" highly offensive to the memories of those BRITISH soldiers. Outnumbered yes outclassed? By the way there were Scots Irish and Welsh as well as Allied troops there..
I also find your "Without wishing to resort to a rather hackneyed "lions led by donkeys" style of argument" also highly derogatory to the Commanders and Officers of the British Army that fought that day. You only have to look at the casualty figures among this group of men to see that a more appropriate "Lions led by Lions would be a better representation.
The courage of Wellington Uxbridge Picton and the Colonels of the various regiments is without question. Wellingtons tactical genius also.. You can only fight a battle with what you have and at a time of your opponent or your own choosing. Considering that to be the case. Wellington had the choice of fighting or retreating. Wellington chose to stand and fight with what he had Outnumbered but with the promise that Blucher would come to his aid.
You say that the British allowed their enemy to make mistakes rather than coming up with a decisive idea of their own. Surely in this situation like in a boxing match. You can either go all out for a knockout or soak up punishment and then counter.
1 March 2013, 8.59pm
I have been fascinated with
I have been fascinated with Waterloo for over 40 years and as it's the only battle that I have in depth knowledge about I have to say that Waterloo was the greatest battle. I do wish though that voters would get their facts straight. The Congress of Vienna was not as a result of the battle of Waterloo; it was during the Congress that news of Napoleon's escape from Elba became known and 'Ney' was not Napoleons chief of staff. Marshall Soult was.
27 February 2013, 6.55pm
Waterloo was pre-eminent in
Waterloo was pre-eminent in the list of engagements because it resulted in the congress and treaty of Vienna, which settled the political landscape for over a mainly peaceful century afterwards. No other battle on the list had such impact.
26 February 2013, 5.37pm
Wellington's attachment to
Wellington's attachment to Assaye reflects its place in his career: having distinguished himself in actions during the advance on Seringapatam he had suffered the debacle of the Sultanpetah Tope affair before showing his capability again as commander of one of three columns in the subsequent storm; but having then been appointed to a senior administrative role in the captured territory over the heads of others through his brother's patronage, the Mahratta war was his first opportunity to show that his promotion was justified and that he could handle an army in the field. Assaye shows Wellington using the lessons he had learned from his previous military experience, using personal reconnaissance and collated intelligence to plan an attack, responding to circumstances to revise those plans and redirect his forces as necessary, and seizing the moment to press on to a successful outcome.
Had Wellesley failed at Assaye, he would be a footnote in history. But his success there, and the new lessons he learned from it, became another block in the wall that Bonaparte's armies battered without success in Spain and Portugal and that the Emperor himself failed to breach at Waterloo, even though (as others have noted) by then Wellington was commanding a very different army. That is one of the reasons why Waterloo deserves my vote - the allied armies may have included reactionaries anxious to re-establish monarchies and reverse the years of revolution, but they equally included people who had experienced first hand the cost of Bonapartism through taxes, levies, and the economic destruction and social disruption that accompanies invading and occupying armies abd bureaucracies.
Wellington put his experience at the service of the rest of Europe and ensured that his force held the road to Brussels until the Prussians could deliver the coup de grace to Bonaparte's reign. Europe has faced other tyrannies since - they have come on in the old way and Europe United has seen them off in the old way. But it was those few days in June 1815 showed that it could be done.
So Waterloo - or rather, the Waterloo campaign - gets my vote as Britain's greatest battle in terms of the detail of the action and the consequences of the outcome. It didn't happen in Britain, but the role of British forces was critical and it freed us from more than 20 years in a state of war on land and sea.
Was it Wellington's greatest battle? It depends on what makes a battle 'great'. I can see why he was proud of Assaye, and Salamanca is a brilliant demonstration of seeing a chance and taking it, but I'd go for another...
26 February 2013, 11.50am
The thing for me that makes
The thing for me that makes Waterloo the greatest battle is its decisiveness. Few other battles in Britain's History has ended a war in a single blow. The battles of the 1st and 2nd World Wars may have involved more men and a greater struggle perhaps, but the war dragged on long after them. It took almost a year after the D-day landings to bring Germany to surrender, but by the time the sun set on the 18th of June Napoleon, the most successful general europe may ever have seen, was utterly defeated and he was abdicate just a few weeks later. Very few times in history has one battle been so decisive. Waterloo did not just end a war, it ended an Era.
26 February 2013, 10.57am
If Wellington had lost the
If Wellington had lost the battle at Waterloo there would not have been a Battle of Britain or a D-Day Landing or for that matter many other subsequent battles effecting our history.
19 February 2013, 11.57pm
The Duke may, in retrospect
The Duke may, in retrospect have regarded Assaye as his greatest achievement, but in terms of world and European significance, Waterloo was unsurpassed as a calculated end to a tyrannical regime that had caused misery and around 3 million deaths in Europe. His steady nerve, calculated alliance with Blucher and the tenacious aid of his Allies and the British Army achieved what had not been done before. His first conflict with Bonaparte was a triumph of steadfast defiance.
Add your comment
Please note: By submitting a comment you are agreeing to the terms laid out in the National Army Museum's Rules for User Comments. Any views expressed in user comments do not necessarily reflect or represent the views of the National Army Museum or its staff.