National Army Museum logo
Visit the National Army Museum Shop
view counter

Britain's Greatest GeneralBritain's Greatest General

11 comments

Ian Henderson
19 January 2011, 2.46pm

Wellington, consistantley

Wellington, consistantley beat all comers (mainly the French) by beating Boney secured peace in Europe, well peace that didn't involve Britain, leaving us more time to conquer and exploit the world! Hooray.

Peter Kerruish
25 January 2011, 1.36pm

Wellington defeated

Wellington defeated Napolaon's grand ideas for the total domination of Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals in an extended campign fought over many years and in different parts of Europe. He never gave up.

David
25 January 2011, 6.53pm

Wellington did not defeat

Wellington did not defeat Napoleon's attempt to dominate Europe - that was done by a combination of the Russian army, the Royal Navy and an awful lot of money from the Treasury. Wellington kept in play a small proportion of the French army in a secondary theatre and with the timely assistance of the Prussian Army he managed to foil an attempt at a comeback in 1815.

Martin Davies
25 January 2011, 7.34pm

Wellington was a great

Wellington was a great General, who consistently defeated the French over many years in the first real World or Great War in Portugal, Spain, France and finally in Belgium at Waterloo - where the defeat finally secured peace in Europe for 40 years.
He was a visionary but also clever and respectful, placing his troops on reverse slopes in battle, to reduce casualties from the enemy artillery. He also became Prime Minister, so followed Military success with some political success. Over a million attended his funeral in London, displaying the depth of affection the Nation had for this one of a kind men.

Stephen de Winton
26 January 2011, 8.16am

Welington's dogged and

Welington's dogged and successful Peninsula campaign kept the French fully occupied and his final defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo, of such immense importance in world history, tips the balance for me.

Allan Converse
26 January 2011, 11.20pm

Why does every current

Why does every current commentator about the Duke whack him as some sort of flogging brute? That's an exaggeration, first of all, and second of all he took excellent care of his men both on and off the battlefield--plus he WON, and his men respected him for it. Victory is the real test, and the Duke won consistently and won the last and most important battle of all. What else matters in evaluating a general?

Allan Converse
26 January 2011, 11.25pm

He was no more of a harsh

He was no more of a harsh disciplinarian than anyone else of his time, and so what if he did use the lash? Command is not a popularity contest. The Duke took excellent care of his men both on and off the field, and he won consistently. Winning is what matters in war, and he won the last and most important battle of all. That is greatness.

David Miler
27 January 2011, 6.08am

The Iron Duke rocks! I'm

The Iron Duke rocks! I'm glad he was busy fighting the frenchies, instead of coming over to the U.S to chastise us..... He's not my very favorite English warrior though. My favorite is Admiral Sir Sidney Smith. He whipped ass on Napoleon big time...

Asad U Khwaja
1 February 2011, 9.06am

Lord Wellington had that

Lord Wellington had that elusive quality, 'military genius' but more than that, he depended more than any other general in British history on careful organisation, planning and concerted effort, steadily and surely gaining ground through his careful strategies. Moreover, he fought in diverse and difficult terrains, against some of the best military commanders and forces, East and West, and defeated them. No other general has such a consistent record.

Harman P.
5 February 2011, 12.49am

'Nothing except a battle lost

'Nothing except a battle lost can be half so melancholy as a battle won'.

COLIN MESSAGE
18 February 2011, 12.35pm

A truly great general - he is

A truly great general - he is reputed never to have lost a gun- but disappointing as a man. He was never loved by man or woman, but he was certainly and rightly, respected. He was a five star general but only a two star individual.

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

(By ticking this box you agree for your name and email address to be added to the National Army Museum's mailing list. You also accept the terms of the National Army Museum's Privacy Policy)

Please note: By submitting a comment you are agreeing to the terms laid out in the National Army Museum's Rules for User Comments. Any views expressed in user comments do not necessarily reflect or represent the views of the National Army Museum or its staff.