National Army Museum logo
Visit the National Army Museum Picture Library
view counter

Britain's Greatest GeneralBritain's Greatest General

6 comments

Dave P
22 February 2011, 1.14pm

This man deserve the title,

This man deserve the title, he won many victories sometimes against great odds due to his tenacity that he won through

Troy G
24 February 2011, 3.17pm

He was also instrumental in

He was also instrumental in the regicide of Charles II, by his brutal actions in Ireland made any possibility of an Anglo-Irish settlement impossible for several hundred years, soured relations with the Scots for generations and imposed Military Rule on England thru the short lived 'Rule of the Military Generals' , sold off the Nation's art collection so much of it now resides in Madrid and Paris, assumed Regal powers from a Rump Parlaiment and then attempted to create dynastic rule thru his son Richard. Not really indicators of good Generalship me thinks!

J T Green
24 February 2011, 3.47pm

A regicide and dictator - he

A regicide and dictator - he compounded in the death of the King, assumed dictatorial powers under the sham of a democratic processs only made 'legal' by a 'Rump' Parliament of his own placemen, was a religious extremist who sold off the Nation's art treasures so that much of it now hangs in the galleries of Continental Europe, soured relations with the Scots for generations, made any settlement with the Irish impossible for hundreds of years, imposed military rule (albieit brief) on England and then tried to foist his son (and dynasty) as a second Lord Protector. Not achievements noramlly associated wioth 'great generalship' me thinks?

Robin Brockman
25 February 2011, 1.46pm

The rants above have nothing

The rants above have nothing to do with generalship and everything to do with politics. But as to that, the king was a traitor to 'his' country, Parliament could agree on nothing, for good or ill, the most infamous instance of his 'brutality' in Ireland was nothing more than long established standard practice when after a long siege, the walls were breached. This practice survived for centuries afterwards. Indeed, worse was to happen under other generals on this list. The same could be said about Scotland, but of course a King was on the throne by then so mass murder and deportation was acceptable. The New Model Army's backing of Cromwell is the closest thing this country has ever seen to a plebiscite for an English head of state. Perhaps that was Cromwell's greatest crime, however. Good God, England ruled by an Englishman! Practically unheard of! Not to be suffered! A proper, foreign royal rump must be available for kissing, and of course as a buffer between the people and the oligarchy/establishment. For the British, who do not trust each other an inch, nothing else will do. The failures of Cromwell's rule are most tragic in their crippling of British republicanism to this day. His generalship though, is second to none on the list and surpasses the majority, if not all. Sorry, but one good rant deserves another. Civil Wars never really end, do they?

Graham Webb
8 April 2011, 10.00am

There have been many talented

There have been many talented military commanders who have come out of various civil unrests, fighting sometimes for Scottish, Welsh or Irish independence. Cromwell does not stand very favourable against them. Taking the Civil War in to account, the achievements of Thomas Fairfax far outweigh those of Cromwell. No room for detail here but I recommend the book 'Black Tom' which makes a good case for Fairfax as the better General. The difference is indeed the politics; which even Cromwellian supporters accept as flawed - as discussed above. Cromwell was backed by a lot of wealthy people, with the might of London and the Merchant companies behind him. He had shown no great political prowess or even an ability to do other than ruin his inheritance. Leaving personal matters aside, consider his foe. At Dunbar his army was out-manoeuvred and cut off with the likelihood of starvation; his soldiers fought a 'break out' action that resulted in an escape; hardly a victory. I could go on, but as a final thought; he never faced a Napoleon, a Tilly, a Gustavus, a Genghis, the Japanese might in Burma or the Germans in North Africa. Let's please finally put this man to rest and recall the charge of the Scots at Marston Moor that rescued Cromwell's wing from possible destruction. I have no idea why we continue to revere this man; it can only be to propagate the myth that a socialist style revolution occurred in England. Langdale's cavalry exploits and even Rupert's cavalry charges appear far braver and more heroic to me. As far as I know, Cromwell's wounds amounted to a slight bruise on the back of the head which caused him to be 'sick bayed' at a critical moment at Marston Moor, other Generals suffered many more privations and personal injuries which were caused, almost certainly by acts of gallantry. Let's consign this man to an embarrassing moment in our political evolution and, yes, I do believe our democracy would have proceeded somewhat better without his intervention. The clue is in Tumble Down Dick.

useless general
21 October 2011, 3.34pm

Cromwell was undefeated in

Cromwell was undefeated in battle and his victory at Dunbar was a masterpiece. For a man who had absolutely no military experience, he deserves his place on the list.

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

(By ticking this box you agree for your name and email address to be added to the National Army Museum's mailing list. You also accept the terms of the National Army Museum's Privacy Policy)

Please note: By submitting a comment you are agreeing to the terms laid out in the National Army Museum's Rules for User Comments. Any views expressed in user comments do not necessarily reflect or represent the views of the National Army Museum or its staff.