National Army Museum logo
Visit the National Army Museum Print Shop
view counter

  • Date: 19 April 1775
  • Location: Middlesex County, Massachusetts (in modern-day USA)
  • Campaign: American War of Independence (1775-83)
  • Combatants: Britain against American colonial rebels
  • Protagonists: Major John Pitcairn and Lieutenant-Colonel Francis Smith (British); Captain John Parker and Colonel James Barrett (American)
  • Outcome: Short-lived British victory, then defeat

3 comments

Dr. Walter Powell
14 February 2013, 9.31pm

While historians on "both

While historians on "both sides of the Pond" have understandably different perspectives, some of the more recent and compelling scholarship on the events leading to Lexington and Concord provide a much more balanced view, and Great Britain does not appear as an "enemy of freedom," but rather the arbiter of a different view of "rights" in a constitutional monarchy than that increasingly held by farmers in the Colony of Massachusetts, who had developed a different interpretation of the "Rights of Englishmen." I urge readers to take a look at American historian David Hackett Fischer's book Paul Revere's Ride, and one can better appreciate the dilemma faced by General Thomas Gage, Commander-in-Chief of British forces in North America, as well as the "radical" views of Paul Revere, Sam Adams, and John Hancock, Whether or not this conflict was preventable, its outcome surely deserves to rank it as one of the most consequential battles in British history, for it all but guaranteed that American moderates who might wish to remain in the Empire could no longer prevail--and the movement towards independence a virtual certainty.

Bernie
13 February 2013, 9.05pm

Cannot believe a running

Cannot believe a running skirmish is in the list - it does not seem to fulfill any of the requirements of a great battle

Vivian
13 February 2013, 3.49pm

American propaganda since the

American propaganda since the American War of Independence has understandably portrayed the British as the enemy of their freedom. The truth is more complex. It can be argued that the Lexington and Concord action was essential to maintain Law and Order in the colonies. Had it not been for the later intervention of the French on the American side, the war for independence might well have been won by Britain. Lexington and Concord would then have been seen as the first significant battle in the campaign to defeat an uprising by a minority of malcontents. In due course, it would have been necessary for the American Colonies to be granted their self determination and government, in which case subsequent history would have been very different.

Add your comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

(By ticking this box you agree for your name and email address to be added to the National Army Museum's mailing list. You also accept the terms of the National Army Museum's Privacy Policy)

Please note: By submitting a comment you are agreeing to the terms laid out in the National Army Museum's Rules for User Comments. Any views expressed in user comments do not necessarily reflect or represent the views of the National Army Museum or its staff.