- Home
- Your Visit
- What's On
- Exhibitions
- Permanent Galleries
- Special Displays
- Online Exhibitions
- Aden Emergency
- Black Asian British Army
- Britain's Greatest General
- Archibald Wavell
- Bernard Law Montgomery
- Claude Auchinleck
- Colin Campbell
- Douglas Haig
- Edmund Allenby
- Frederick Roberts
- Garnet Wolseley
- Gerald Templer
- Herbert Kitchener
- How to Vote
- James Wolfe
- Jan Smuts
- John Moore
- Leaderboard
- Oliver Cromwell
- Robert Clive
- Robert Sale
- The Duke of Marlborough
- The Duke of Wellington
- Thomas Fairfax
- William Slim
- Conflicts of Interest
- Cyprus, 1954-2008
- D-Day and the Battle for Normandy
- Defeat in the West
- Draw Your Weapons
- Enemy Commanders: Britain's Greatest Foes
- Falklands War, 1982
- First Shots
- Florence Nightingale
- Helmand
- Indian Armies, Indian Art
- Kenya, 1952-60
- Korea 1950–53
- National Service
- North Africa, 1940-43
- Northern Ireland, 1969-2007
- Operation Market Garden
- Palestine
- TELIC
- The Gurkhas
- The Making of Britain
- The Malayan Emergency
- The Opium War
- The Road to Kabul
- The War for America
- The Western Front, 1918
- Victory in Europe
- WAACs at War
- War Horse: Fact & Fiction
- War in the Balkans, 1941-45
- Wives and Sweethearts
- Zulu War, 1879
- Kids
- Education
- Collection
- Research
- Get Involved
- Museum Shop



19 January 2011, 12.11am
A superb starategist with
A superb starategist with foresight, appreciation of the enemy and a depth of understanding of the logistic battle beyond most 'non-logisticians' which actually was a major factor in his considerable sucessess.
He was the first and most farsighted of Britains Generals in the 2nd WW and was undermined by Churchill for no good reason other than Churchills insistance that Wavell support a sideshow in Greece rather than definitively smash Rommells troops in North Africa.
An excellent General, well worth studying; his sucesses far outweighted his defeat at Tobruck by Rommell which was actually, just a tactical setback caused by a strategic decision which was not right in the first place by a Prime Minister who, whilst untimately was strategically successfull by 1945, interfered with tactical decisions far too often.
25 January 2011, 4.13pm
Not the greatest general;
Not the greatest general; but perhaps the one it would be most agreeable to have dinner with.
25 January 2011, 6.25pm
Perhaps not the best of our
Perhaps not the best of our WW2 generals, but close, and streets ahead of the interfering Winston Churchill. I have never forgotten his (rare) acid comment that heavy casualties were not evidence of good tactics!
28 January 2011, 9.33am
The only General in WW2 to
The only General in WW2 to control the vast Mediteranean and the Near East all at the same time. Abbysinia-Western Desert-Greece and Crete-Syria and Iraq. With poor resources he did his best even though he was forced to obey the political line eg Greece and Crete! Even so any man that could produce an anthology of poetry-"Anotherman's Flowers"while "Generaling" must be excellent
2 February 2011, 1.56pm
Archibald Percival Wavell
Archibald Percival Wavell was an excellent General who had fame in his famous Regiment The Black Watch . He was Field Marshall when my godfather Brigadier James A Oliver Black Watch was serving in WW2 .
17 May 2011, 2.42pm
Could have been great if he
Could have been great if he had been allowed to drive the Italians out of Africa instead of defending the indefensible in Greece and Crete. When people talk of how the enigma intercepts shortened the war I am reminded that we dared not set up proper defences in Crete in case we revealed our ability to decode enigma and of the report to Berlin outlining Rommel's poor situation when the Auk was ordered to mount his failed offensive.
21 November 2011, 5.11pm
Just as well because if Italy
Just as well because if Italy had been driven out, the Germans would not have diverted vain resources to it. Britain could afford the army needed for Africa as it couldn't practically do much else with it's army anyway at the time. Germany couldn't afford the troops not in Russia, and even less the long supply lines needed for it.
Add your comment
Please note: By submitting a comment you are agreeing to the terms laid out in the National Army Museum's Rules for User Comments. Any views expressed in user comments do not necessarily reflect or represent the views of the National Army Museum or its staff.