• 10.00am - 5.30pm
  • FREE
  • Chelsea, London
National Army Museum
  • 10.00am - 5.30pm
  • FREE
  • Chelsea, London


Fit to fight: Women in the Army today

Private Laura Docherty, Royal Army Medical Corps, on patrol in Helmand, 2010


In 1992, the Women’s Royal Army Corps was disbanded, and its non-medical members merged into the new Adjutant General’s Corps. This marked the beginning of women's full integration into the British Army.

By 2016, women could work in 80 per cent of the jobs available to male soldiers. These included signalers, medics, clerks, dog handlers, drivers, intelligence analysts and military police.

Royal Military Police personnel inspect shipping containers in Iraq, 2005


Although no longer restricted to a single, separate female unit, many women still had to work to overcome male prejudice. Private Lucy Gartshore served with 210 Battery, Royal Artillery, before joining the Royal Logistic Corps. She recalled:

‘I refer to it as a man’s world, because I’ve found that although men mean well they jump in instinctively and help you out. I was at my old battery for five and half years. We changed to light guns in the last year. It was hard to get used to as you have six people on it. That includes lifting it. It weighs 1,860 kg.

There were a few people who had a problem with women being there, saying we’re not strong enough… The lads would just watch us doing it all because some didn’t think we could do it as some parts are very heavy, like the breech… [Eventually] we had definitely changed the minds of the lads as they loved us on the gun and all treated us equal.’
Private Lucy Gartshore, 2016

Combat roles

Women had now been absorbed into the main body of the Army, but they were still restricted to support and medical positions.

Much of the debate about opening up combat roles to female soldiers focused on the potential impact on battle effectiveness.

A 2002 Ministry of Defence study concluded that women in ground combat roles could adversely affect ‘unit cohesion’.

Others questioned whether female physical and psychological characteristics were suitable for combat, rather than taking their overall contributions into account.

Such misgivings existed despite the fact that women were already serving at the front. Six women were killed in action in Iraq (2003-11), and another three in Afghanistan (2001-14). Female soldiers also served as combat medics and displayed bravery under fire.

Private Leanne Jordan guarding the British Force Headquarters main gate, Kosovo, 1999

Private Leanne Jordan guarding the British Force Headquarters main gate, Kosovo, 1999

A female soldier working at an Iraqi police training facility, 2004

Under fire

Private Michelle Norris of the Royal Army Medical Corps became the first woman to be awarded the Military Cross when her unit came under attack at Al Amarah in Iraq in June 2006. She rescued the wounded commander of her Warrior vehicle while under sniper fire, climbing up the side of it and dragging him to safety inside.

Her commanding officer, Lieutenant Colonel David Labouchere, said: 'Private Norris acted completely selflessly and, in the face of great danger, concentrated on her job and saved someone's life.'

Michelle Norris MC in Iraq, August 2006


Sergeant Chantelle Taylor, Royal Army Medical Corps, recalled that she chose to become a combat medic because, from the list of roles available to her as a woman, ‘it was the only one with the word “combat” in it’.

In July 2008, during her second tour of Afghanistan, her convoy was ambushed near Marjah. In the subsequent firefight, Taylor became the first female British soldier to kill an enemy combatant. 

Sergeant Chantelle Taylor, Royal Army Medical Corps, in Afghanistan, 2006

Sergeant Chantelle Taylor, Royal Army Medical Corps (right) in Afghanistan, 2006


The positive contributions made by women in Iraq and Afghanistan answered many questions about female suitability for the most challenging deployments. In 2009, the Ministry of Defence changed its view. A new report concluded that there was no statistically significant evidence in relation to women and unit cohesion. Still, women remained excluded from close combat roles.

Five years later, the Women in Close Combat Review recommended ending the ban on women in front-line infantry and armoured corps roles. And finally, in 2015, the Government announced that all armed forces roles would be open to women.

Soldiers of The King's Troop, Royal Horse Artillery, perform security duties in Downing Street during Operation Temperer, 2017

‘The chief of [the] general staff has recommended that we lift the ban on women in ground close combat, a view that has been supported by the other service chiefs.

I agree with his advice and have accepted his recommendation. I have asked that this is implemented as soon as possible. It is vital that our armed forces are world class and reflect the society we live in. Lifting this ban is a major step. It will ensure the armed forces can make the most of all their talent and increase opportunities for women to serve in the full range of roles.’
Prime Minister David Cameron, 2015

New roles

The ban on women serving in some parts of the Royal Armoured Corps was lifted in July 2016. Role-based training began in November of that year for women wanting to join the infantry. And, in April 2017, the first female officer was commissioned into the Royal Tank Regiment.

In October 2018, Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson announced that all combat roles were open to women, including infantry and special forces units.

Soldiers of 2nd Battalion, The Royal Highland Fusiliers, Helmand Province, 2011


Some former officers remain concerned that women will not be able to meet the same physical demands as men and lower the overall standards of fighting units.

‘The infantry is no place for a woman, and to permit them to serve in close combat roles is a pure politically correct extravagance… The physical bar for joining [close combat] units… need to be raised, never lowered.’
Colonel Tim Collins, 2016

An international perspective

The United States military opened up all roles to women at the end of 2015. A US Marines task force was put to the test in a year-long study into the effects of gender integration. The results showed that all-male units outperformed integrated units, and women were six times more likely than men to be injured during training.

Studies like this continue to feed the debate on whether women are fit to fight on the front line. 

Members of the public have their say on the 'women in combat' debate, Chelsea, March 2017

The public have their say on the 'women in combat' debate at a museum event in Chelsea, March 2017

Explore further

Join the conversation

"First time @NAM_London today. Thoroughly enjoyed it. Thought the presentation & interpretation made the subject accessible..."